Kendrick 4,714 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 6 hours ago, Da Trifecta said: @Kendrick this here I get that, but it's still Riga's pick. If it were Cologne's pick it might be 5th-8th though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FacePuncher 1,343 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Seems like in this draft the top 4 prospects are the only for sure commodities. And there's always a big difference between 4th and 4th. If you're 5th you will be that no matter what, if you are 4th you get to try your luck in the lottery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Trifecta 1,896 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 13 hours ago, Kendrick said: I get that, but it's still Riga's pick. If it were Cologne's pick it might be 5th-8th though. Yeah I know. We did just lose to Riga so it may be possible we could lose out. I mean we aren't even .500 and in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Admin Will 4,604 Posted June 14, 2016 Senior Admin Share Posted June 14, 2016 On 6/11/2016 at 3:44 PM, gregreg said: To Seattle: S50 1st S50 3rd To Cologne: RW - Niels Skovgaard I accept, glad to have @Tim join the express! Thanks for the deal @Banackock Just updating draft pick tracker here, just FYI that the 3rd is actually S51 COL 3rd (S50 belongs to HSK) gregreg 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eaglesfan036 4,583 Posted June 27, 2016 Share Posted June 27, 2016 lol seattle didn't even get a lotto pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoop 3,254 Posted June 27, 2016 Share Posted June 27, 2016 1 hour ago, eaglesfan036 said: lol seattle didn't even get a lotto pick And no one thought they were Will 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 On 6/26/2016 at 10:02 PM, eaglesfan036 said: lol seattle didn't even get a lotto pick Not everyone can suck as bad as Calgary. You have a talent for sucking. Daniel 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 17 minutes ago, Banackock said: Not everyone can suck as bad as Calgary. You have a talent for sucking. Be careful because Seattle has a good track record of sucking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 32 minutes ago, Kendrick said: Be careful because Seattle has a good track record of sucking. That was prior to my tenure. #TrustTheProcess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 33 minutes ago, Banackock said: That was prior to my tenure. #TrustTheProcess I was talking about Seattle's track record. As in Seattle is in no shape to trash talk haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 5,009 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, Kendrick said: I was talking about Seattle's track record. As in Seattle is in no shape to trash talk haha PFFT! I was there in S43. I watched the miracle on ice happen! Banackock 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 27 minutes ago, Kendrick said: I was talking about Seattle's track record. As in Seattle is in no shape to trash talk haha Better than CGY. Playoff team if it wasn't so competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molholt 2,183 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Banackock said: if it wasn't so competitive. ...isn't that the point though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 55 minutes ago, Banackock said: Better than CGY. Playoff team if it wasn't so competitive. You are saying Seattle has a better track record than Calgary in the past? I know you're new but come on now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Molholt said: ...isn't that the point though? Generally, it isn't this competitive was my point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 18 minutes ago, Kendrick said: You are saying Seattle has a better track record than Calgary in the past? I know you're new but come on now. NO. YOU'RE talking about the past, I'm talking about NOW. I could give a shit about the past. Has nothing to do with me, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, Banackock said: NO. YOU'RE talking about the past, I'm talking about NOW. I could give a shit about the past. Has nothing to do with me, lol. But.. but you brought up Calgary sucking. If it's this season you are speaking of solely, then either team should shut up haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, Kendrick said: But.. but you brought up Calgary sucking. If it's this season you are speaking of solely, then either team should shut up haha. Only thing wrong with 40-30-2 is that it wasn't good enough for our conference. Any other year, Bears would have been in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kendrick 4,714 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Banackock said: Only thing wrong with 40-30-2 is that it wasn't good enough for our conference. Any other year, Bears would have been in. But if you don't make the playoffs and have to sell all your players off, it's not really a success. So both teams are watching from home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 4 minutes ago, Kendrick said: But.. but you brought up Calgary sucking. If it's this season you are speaking of solely, then either team should shut up haha. Safe to say if it wasn't at stacked, we would have held on and achieved more than 82 points but even with 82 points.. we would have made the playoffs 5/6 times during S44 to 48. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banackock 7,630 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, Kendrick said: But if you don't make the playoffs and have to sell all your players off, it's not really a success. So both teams are watching from home. Truth. We're the better of the shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight 1,216 Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Seattle were always a fun target. It's like picking a fight with someone you know you'll beat. Could toy with them, give them false hope, and crush them regardless. Good times BOOM, Victor and Kendrick 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Victor 10,527 Posted July 3, 2016 Admin Share Posted July 3, 2016 On 6/27/2016 at 5:02 AM, eaglesfan036 said: lol seattle didn't even get a lotto pick (yeah I know Seattle still benefits from Davos losing since they have both picks) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.ed69a7260a477fcf4feead7a0e4b7506.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now